Exosome Evidence Index

Products named in published studies

Clinics often tell you a product name. If it appears here, you can see what was actually tested, in whom, and how strong that evidence is.

ProductMaker or sponsorMade fromWhere it was studiedStrongest evidence so far
ExoSCRT platformExoCoBioFat stem cellsAcne scars (Kwon 2020), skin aging (Park 2023)Small controlled trials, 12 weeks
ASCEplus Derma Signal Kit SRLVExoCoBioRose stem cells (plant)Several skin conditions (2025 case series)Case series
XoGloKimera LabsPlacentaKeloid scars (Chernoff 2022)Study without a control group
ExovexNot stated in the study summaryPlacentaHealing after aesthetic procedures (Peredo 2024)Case series
Unnamed exosome blendStudy funded by BenevHuman fat and rose stem cellsSkin aging, compared with PRP (2025)Non-randomized split-face trial
ExoFloDirect BiologicsBone marrowCOVID-19 lung failure (Sengupta 2020, Lightner 2023); phase 3 in ARDS from any cause underwayPhase 2 trial, mixed result
EVA-100EVast BioUmbilical cordKnee osteoarthritis (Figueroa-Valdés 2025)Single case, safety only
PLEXARIS OSExopharmDonor plateletsSkin wounds in healthy volunteers (Johnson 2023)Phase 1 trial, no faster healing
ECPE formulationDASAN C&Tech (maker); Cosmedician AP (supplied materials)Exosomes of unstated source plus seaweed and Thuja extractsMale pattern hair loss (Amini 2025)Small randomized trial, 16 weeks
UNEX-42United TherapeuticsStem cellsPremature infants at risk of lung diseaseTrial stopped for a safety event

A product listed here is not approved for any use, and a study of it does not mean a clinic's use of it is supported. Products tested only in the lab or in animals are not listed.